Articles
Vol. 1 (2025): Philogram Journal for Advanced Philosophical Research
Formation and Exploitation of Echo Chambers and Epistemic Bubbles in Politics
-
Submitted
-
22 June 2025
-
Published
-
01-12-2025
Abstract
The formation and exploitation of echo chambers and epistemic bubbles have become tools in modern global politics, rivaling military force and economic sanctions. State and non-state actors deliberately construct these informational spaces to influence and manipulate both national and international outcomes. Echo chambers create a disparity in trust between members and non-members by discrediting non-members and amplifying the epistemic credentials of members. In contrast, epistemic bubbles exclude relevant epistemic sources, leaving individuals unaware of gaps in their understanding. The control and manipulation of information through these structures provide a significant advantage in shaping socio-political affairs. Disinformation campaigns, selective filtering of information, and the strategic use of social media algorithms reinforce ideological narratives and limit exposure to alternative viewpoints. The exploitation of echo chambers and epistemic bubbles raises ethical concerns, as it violates principles of epistemic justice, fairness, and liberty. It hinders the ability to form rational beliefs, diminishes the quality of public discourse. The interconnection of truth, power, and knowledge is exploited through these structures, as controlling knowledge is equated with controlling power. Addressing the deliberate creation and exploitation of echo chambers and epistemic bubbles is crucial for fostering a well-informed citizenry and maintaining the integrity of public discourse. In this context, considering multiculturalism could offer a possible way forward.
References
- Basumatary, J. Michel Foucault on Regenerative Relatedness of Power/Knowledge and Truth. J. Indian Counc. Philos. Res. 37, 323–341 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40961-020-00224-
- Bradshaw, Samantha, and Philip N. Howard. The Global Disinformation Disorder: 2019 Global Inventory of Organised Social Media Manipulation. Oxford Internet Institute, 2019.
- Fricker, Miranda. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford University Press, 2007.
- Luper, Steven. “Epistemic Relativism.” Philosophical Issues, vol. 14, 2004, pp. 271–95. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/3050631.
- Mike Isaac, “Facebook Said to Create Censorship Tool to Get Back into China,” New York Times, November 22, 2016, http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/22/technology/facebook-censorship-tool-china.html.
- Myers, Lee, and Paul Mozur. “China Is Waging a Disinformation War Against Hong Kong Protesters.” New York Times, 3 Sept. 2019, https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/13/world/asia/hong-kong-protests-china.html.
- Nelson, Jacob L., and James G. Webster. “The Myth of Partisan Selective Exposure: A Portrait of the Online Political News Audience.” Social Media and Society, vol. 3, no. 3, Sept. 2017, p. 205630511772931, https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117729314.
- Nguyen, C. Thi. “Echo Chambers and Epistemic Bubbles.” Episteme, vol. 17, no. 2, June 2020, pp. 141–61, https://doi.org/10.1017/EPI.2018.32.
- Roberts, Sarah T. Behind the Screen: Content Moderation in the Age of Internet Trolls, Fake News, and the Global Issues of the Digital Age. Yale University Press, 2020
- Sunstein, Cass R. Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media. Princeton University Press, 2017.
- Tufekci, Zeynep. Twitter and Tear Gas: The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest. Yale University Press, 2017.